The San Bernardino County grand jury is investigating the potential sale of
1,200 acres of surplus flood-control land in Rancho Cucamonga, and
whether a certain developer is getting preferential treatment.
Five developers are vying for the land, and the county will ultimately decide which gets it.
At least one county supervisor and three Rancho Cucamonga officials have been questioned by the San Bernardino County grand jury regarding the property.
Rancho Cucamonga Mayor Don Kurth said he met with the grand jury last week and was asked about the value of the land and whether the city will benefit from its development. He said the city would not be getting any development fees.
"We've asked the county for those fees, but the county told us they're counting on the development fees to be part of the sale," Kurth said. "(The grand jury) thought we were somehow benefiting by it."
Rancho Cucamonga City Manager Jack Lam said he met with the grand jury and confirmed the topic of questioning was the 1,200-acre property located north of Los Osos High School.
Rancho Cucamonga City Councilman Rex Gutierrez said he met with the Grand Jury on April 7.
"They were wondering whether or not if I felt this deal was a sweetheart deal that would benefit the Rancho Alliance, and in particular, the former members of Diversified Pacific," Gutierrez said. "They were trying to establish whether or not preferences were given to one applicant over another."
Jeff Burum, a principal in Diversified Pacific, is also part of Rancho Alliance Investors, a consortium of developers seeking to develop the land. Burum is also co-managing partner of the Colonies Partners, which sued the county over a flood-control basin on its Upland development. At one time, the 1,200 acres now up for grabs were part of a proposed settlement between the Colonies and the county, but the land was taken off the table after concerns were raised that the county was undervaluing the land as part of the settlement. The county later agreed to pay the Colonies $102 million to settle the lawsuit.
Gutierrez said the grand jury was looking into how the land was appraised, and whether or not it benefitted developers, or if the Board of Supervisors had done anything to give Diversified Pacific some kind of advantage.
Gary Ovitt, chairman of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, met with the grand jury about two weeks ago to discuss the issue, said Mark Kirk, his chief of staff.
"There were a lot of questions that were asked," Kirk said, declining to elaborate on what specifically was discussed.
Burum has become ensnared in an investigation into the county Assessor's Office. He gave Jim Erwin, the former assistant assessor and chief of staff for Supervisor Neil Derry, a $13,000 Rolex watch and a trip to New York City in return for helping shepherd the Colonies settlement.
Burum is on vacation and couldn't be reached for comment for this story.
Erwin has been charged with 10 felony counts of failing to properly report the gifts and will be arraigned May 20.
In February, the Board of Supervisors approved an agreement with the county Flood Control District for the purchase of the land. Once the county buys the land, it will then enter into an entitlement agreement with a selected developer.
A preliminary appraisal of the land by the county determined its value at between $37.5 million and $75 million, but Supervisor Paul Biane has estimated its value at between $25 million and $50 million. Another appraisal is expected next month.
Rancho Alliance Investors is composed of Diversified Pacific, Rancho Cucamonga-based Young Homes, Upland-based Lewis Homes and Walnut-based Shea Homes, and also includes Riverside-based O'Reilly Public Relations and a consulting company owned by former Sen. Jim Brulte.
The four developers competing with Rancho Alliance are not based in the Inland Empire, and that could be a major disadvantage.
Rancho Cucamonga officials have said they will likely lean toward the developer with the biggest footprint in the community.
Rancho City Councilwoman Diane Williams said because the projects that Rancho Alliance is responsible for are in the city, it's easy to have a sense of trust.
"They're local and we can count on them. We've had lots of dealings with the Lewises," Williams said.
Kirk said Ovitt has been rethinking his opinion as to what the best direction is to take regarding the 1,200 acres.
"We have actually started talking in our office - talking about other options other than the current process of awarding it to a developer and negotiating some sort of deal with the developer," Kirk said.
The county can pull out of its contract with Rancho at any time, which is stipulated in the contract, Kirk said.
joe.nelson@inlandnewspapers.com
wendy.leung@inlandnewspapers.com